Resource title

Courts of many minds

Resource image

image for OpenScout resource :: Courts of many minds

Resource description

In A Constitution of Many Minds (Princeton UP 2009), Cass Sunstein argues that the three major approaches to constitutional interpretation all rely on some variation of a “Many Minds” argument: -- “Traditionalists” would have judges defer to the “Many Minds” on previous courts; -- “Populists” would have judges defer to the “Many Minds” in the electorate at large; -- “Cosmopolitans” would have judges defer to the “Many Minds” on foreign benches. Here we assess each of these claims through the lens of the Condorcet Jury Theorem. In the cases of the Traditionalist and Cosmopolitan approaches we explore the implications of partial interdependence among past and foreign courts, respectively. In the case of the Populist approach, we consider the influence of opinion leaders.

Resource author

Resource publisher

Resource publish date

Resource language

en

Resource content type

Resource resource URL

http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30678/

Resource license