Resource title

Do adolescents with ‘eating disorder not otherwise specified’ (EDNOS) or full-syndrome bulimia nervosa differ in clinical severity, co-morbidity, risk factors, treatment outcome or cost?

Resource image

image for OpenScout resource :: Do adolescents with ‘eating disorder not otherwise specified’ (EDNOS) or full-syndrome bulimia nervosa differ in clinical severity, co-morbidity, risk factors, treatment outcome or cost?

Resource description

Objective: We wanted to know whether adolescents with eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) differ from those with bulimia nervosa (BN) in clinical features, comorbidity, risk factors, treatment outcome or cost. Method: Adolescents with EDNOS (n = 24) or BN (n = 61) took part in a trial of family therapy versus guided self-care. At baseline, eating disorder symptoms, risk factors, and costs were assessed by interview. Patients were reinterviewed at 6 and 12 months. Results: Compared with EDNOS, BN patients binged, vomited and purged significantly more, and were more preoccupied with food. Those with EDNOS had more depression and had more current and childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder. 66.6% of EDNOS versus 27.8% of BN patients were abstinent from bingeing and vomiting at 1 year. Diagnosis did not moderate treatment outcome. Costs did not differ between groups. Conclusion: EDNOS in adolescents is not trival. It has milder eating disorder symptoms but more comorbidity than BN.

Resource author

Resource publisher

Resource publish date

Resource language

en

Resource content type

Resource resource URL

http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22929/

Resource license