Resource title

Performance of family firms: evidence from US and European firms and investors

Resource image

image for OpenScout resource :: Performance of family firms: evidence from US and European firms and investors

Resource description

The fundamental question we address is to see how, across the different national and legal contexts of the US, UK, France and Germany, family firms have performed when compared with non-family firms. We look at three different performance angles: Return on Assets, Tobin's Q, and Total Shareholder Return. Exploring the third criterion further, we also ask whether investors look at these firms as different, and if so, how? We find a remarkably robust result: family firms over the period 1993-2002 in France, Germany, the UK and US never fare worse on these three performance measures relative to non-family firms, and in fact fare better on several of them. In addition, we find that stock returns of the family firms are well explained by classic four-factor pricing models which indicate how returns derive from risks assumed by particular firms. These models confirm that family firm portfolios present different risk exposures when compared across countries and also when compared with non-family firm portfolios in their respective countries. These differences indicate that both geography and ownership structure ought to matter for investors.

Resource author

Resource publisher

Resource publish date

Resource language

en

Resource content type

application/pdf

Resource resource URL

http://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2006/2006-53.pdf

Resource license

Copyright INSEAD. All rights reserved