Resource title

The Accuracy of extrapolative forecasting methods: additional empirical evidence

Resource image

image for OpenScout resource :: The Accuracy of extrapolative forecasting methods: additional empirical evidence

Resource description

Replication is an important aspect of hard sciences in developing and objective knowledge base that the great majority of scientists can accept. In social sciences, however, replication has proved problematic. One of the exceptions has been the M-competition whose calculations and conclusions have been replicated by many researchers. In order to extend the range under which extrapolative methods have been compared we examine a unique set of 263 series. Unlike the M-competition data they come from a single source countaining series of similar characteristics (the same calendar, no seasonality, little randomness, and a downward sloping trend). We show that the conclusions of the M-competition are still valid while at the same time it is found that robust-trend, a new method not used in the M-competition, outperforms all other methods. In addition, the relative performance of exponential smoothing is shown to depend on the ways its parameters are optimized. The implications of these conclusions are discuss

Resource author

Resource publisher

Resource publish date

Resource language

en

Resource content type

application/pdf

Resource resource URL

http://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/Inseadwp1995/95-04.pdf

Resource license

Copyright INSEAD. All rights reserved